HSE Covid vaccine information (from thge HSE website dated December 17th) peddles two misleading LIES that constitute malfeasance-in-public-office through lying to the public to promote the safety and efficacy of the vaccine when they say the following:
HSE Lie #1: “Research and testing is completed on a number of COVID-19 vaccines”
The Truth refuting Lie #1: When the HSE posted the above information on December 17th the Moderna, Pfizer and Astra Zeneca vaccines were still under review by the EMA for “conditional marketing authorisation” only and not full regulatory approval. In the US such conditional approval to market a vaccine is conferred by the FDA and is known as “emergency use approval (EUA)” and it means exactly the same thing in both US and EU jurisdictions, i.e.
The FDA defines emergency use approval (EUA) as follows:
“An Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) is a mechanism to facilitate the availability and use of medical countermeasures, including vaccines, during public health emergencies, such as the current COVID-19 pandemic. Under an EUA, FDA may allow the use of unapproved medical products …to treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases when there are no approved, and available alternatives…… FDA also expects manufacturers who receive an EUA to continue their clinical trials to obtain additional safety and effectiveness information and pursue licensure (approval).
i.e. research to confirm safety and efficacy has not been completed and as mentioned earlier the process has also skipped animal trials and gone straight to humans. No long term studies to assess safety have been completed and adverse reactions such as anaphylaxis have been glossed over.
HSE Lie #2: “These [ Covid-19 vaccines] are now in the final stages of licensing and approval in Europe”.
The Truth refuting Lie #2: By December 21 Pfizer / Biontech vaccine was granted “conditional marketing authorisation” only and the others were still in review [evidence for this is bullet pointed below]. This statement is false because conditional marketing authorisation is not full regulatory approval.
By February 2021 the above HSE vaccine information leaflet (click on above pdf file) that is now in every GP’s office in Ireland, peddles the same lies.
No animal testing – what could possibly go wrong?
“The most forward-thinking coronavirus researchers are forgoing cruel and archaic tests on animals in favour of cutting-edge human-relevant methods.
The US National Institutes of Health (NIH) decided to speed up the development of a possible vaccine by bypassing a lengthy animal testing phase in favour of testing it directly in humans. While some tests on animals were still involved in this case, NIH’s decision is a huge step towards safe, straight-to-human vaccine trials in the future.
This shift in thinking is long overdue. NIH reports that 95 percent of drugs that pass animal tests fail in human trials because they are either unsafe or ineffective.
Stephen Donnelly won’t lose any sleep over the above statement but perhaps you should: Meditate on the statement highlighted in yellow for a moment:
95% of all vaccines that have been tested on animals first don’t make it to humans because they are either unsafe of ineffective. i.e. only 5% of new vaccines are deemed safe and / or effective for use on humans.
Your Government is lying to you:
Looking at the underlined parts of the HSE information leaflet we see that
Wouldn’t you like to see Micheal Martin, Leo Varadkar, Stephen Donnelly & co. in Dail Eireann try to tell the families of these victims that the Covid vaccines are safe?
Pfizer – UK vaccine adverse reaction report here:
Oxford Astra Zeneca – UK vaccine adverse reaction report here:
AND IF THE ABOVE INJURIES AND DEATHS STILL DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ENOUGH DEATHS OR ADVERSE REACTIONS TO SCARE YOU OFF GETTING THE JAB? LET’S SEE HOW THEY ARE FARING IN THE US:
Covid-19 Vaccines Deaths According to VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System):
and if you are still 100% fine with those US death stats then consider this Harvard Study into the soundness of VAERS data that concludes that fewer than 1% of adverse reaction deaths are even reported to VAERS. You do the math on the real numbers….
For those of you with short memories this is not the first time that the Irish Government has encouraged the citizenry to take a vaccine that they said was safe and now the taxpayer must foot a one billion euro bill:
END THE COVID VACCINE ROLLOUT FOR ONCE AND FOR ALL…
Some necessary background perspective:
To understand how to permanently stop the Covid-19 vaccine rollout, we must first consider some realities pertaining to the knowledge of Irish medical professionals and the conditions of their employment. Once we understand these, the plan to tackle the problem becomes obvious. We begin by presenting these insights:
A UK example: Beginning from 1min and 4 seconds into this clip we hear an NHS vaccine specialist speak out about the wholesale lack of knowledge among colleague doctors, nurses and even medical specialists surrounding the dangers of Covid-19 vaccines, vaccine ingredients and the scale of adverse reactions.
An Irish Example: A recent Facebook post told the story of how an Irish person attended a local GP’s practice to request a medical exemption from requiring a covid-19 vaccination citing justification for the exemption upon the following bases:
Justification #1: All covid-19 vaccines have been given emergency use approval only: None had completed clinical trials and, even when their respective ongoing clinical trials have been completed (somewhere between 2022 to 2024 depending on the vaccine), all of these trials will have skipped the usual animal trials. This made the patient nervous. The patient did not want to be coerced into injecting an untested vaccine into her blood stream to enable her to keep her job.
Justification #2: The patient was already taking medication for a serious a pre-existing condition and pointed out that clinical studies had not been carried out to determine the safety of covid ‘vaccine’ when taken in combination with the medication that the patient was already taking.
Justification #3: The patient present hardcopy printouts to her GP showing the overwhelming evidence of vaccine injury that the media will not publish, these printouts included:
At the time of her GP visit, this data clearly showed 167,000 in the EU alone experiencing serious adverse reactions. She pointed out that tens of thousands in the EU experienced serious adverse reactions in a manner that exactly mirrored her pre-existing medical condition. She asked her GP if she agreed that these adverse events were of concern since her health had already been significantly compromised by a similar pre-existing condition that has had her hospitalized in the past. Moreover, there had been circa 3150 EU deaths of vaccine recipients soon after having vaccine. The GP was incredulous i.e., the GP doubted that what she was being told was even true: i.e., she had only heard of the 78 blood clot deaths widely reported on the MSM and was astounded to hear that 3150 deaths and 167,000 adverse events had been reported in the EU.
Thereafter the encounter with the GP becomes like something out of a Franz Kafka novel: Despite the evidence presented, the GP still claimed that the vaccines were “safe”. The patient asked her if she would be happy to tell the relatives of the thousands of vaccine dead and vaccine maimed that these vaccines were safe? The GP said that the “benefits outweighed the risks” and again she was asked if she would be happy to say that to the relatives of the thousands of vaccine dead and vaccine maimed? The GP then told the patient that she would “never find an Irish Doctor that would write a letter of exemption because all Irish doctors are in one way or another on the payroll of the HSE and the HSE recommended the vaccines, and no doctor would go against the HSE”.
The nub of the problem:
Truth-Watch.Today’s Medical Entrapment Plan:
We need truthers in every town in Ireland to
The intent is that any medical professional engaged in administering these shots need only read the headlines of each article to get the general idea that these vaccines are indeed causing harm. Once you have served them with the evidence, they can no longer deny in a court of law that they were ignorant of the harm caused by these vaccines – the legal liability trap has now been sprung. Any vaccines administered following receipt of these documents is a vaccine administered despite clear knowledge of harm to patients. A conviction on these grounds is enough to get them struck off the medical register and to have their licenses to practice revoked.
The very first thing the doctor or nurse should see as they open your registered envelope is the notice of liability letter and underneath this letter should be all of the documents you have printed out as per (1) above.
Once GPs have been made aware of the scale of the vaccine injuries and begin receiving notices of liability,
they will start to get nervous and should any reader of TWT know of anyone that does die following their shot that reader should contact the family and inform them of why they can and should take a legal case against the doctor or nurse. Once these cases start in earnest doctors won’t want to administer the jabs. They will not be able to deny knowledge of vaccine injury in court if you and other truthers can testify that you sent them the data. Then they will be guilty of premeditated malpractice and struck off the medical register.
The letter that should accompany of the evidence of vaccine injury and death is as follows:
Dear [enter the GPs name here],
FYI: Covid-19 mRNA vaccines do not meet the medical definition of a vaccine; they are gene untested therapy
The intent of this communication is:
In light of the above you should consider this communication a notice of liability should you decide to engage in the administration of these treatments on gullible and unwitting patients. Should any of your patients die following these vaccines the families of the bereaved will be contacted and advised that they can and should (in the name of safe guarding others) prosecute you personally in a court of law on a charge of contributary manslaughter or other charge relating to bodily harm and medical malfeasance.
Please respond to this correspondence to confirm whether it is your intent to administer any of the so-called mRNA covid-19 ‘vaccines’ despite the attached clear evidence of harm caused to patients by these treatments.
Please also confirm if you plan to prescribe hydroxychloroquine, the safest medicine with the most proven track record to any patients presenting with respiratory illness to any patient presenting with respiratory illness that you suspect may be SARS-COV2?
– sign off the letter as “concerned citizen” if you want to remain anonymous for now – but if and when the court case comes you must be willing to take the stand and testify that you sent the evidence of vaccine harm to the doctor or nurse. Get a friend to film you putting the data in the envelopes and then have some more footage taken of you posting them off at the post office and getting the registered post receipts and filming the tracking numbers.. You need to be able to prove that the evidence was presented to the doctor to prove they they engaged in premeditated harm.