As a necessary preamble for illustrative purposes, consider this fictitious Kilkenny serial killer scenario: Three elderly gentlemen disappear over the space of three consecutive weekends in Kilkenny at various times estimated between 10:00pm and midnight. None of the men had anything in common per se save that they were all aged in their 80’s; each was managing a pre-existing health condition and all of the men were in the habit of venturing out to quiet bars in the town for one or two pints on a Saturday night before getting a taxi home. Within days of each disappearance RTE News reports would confirm that the deceased bodies of all three men had been discovered on the outskirts of the town by Gardai assisted by volunteer search teams at various locations. The state pathologist attended all these locations would later confirm that all three of the men had been murdered. A serial killer was at large in Kilkenny. The Gardai wasted no time in putting a team of investigators on the case and quickly traced each victim’s last movements in the town. Examination of CCTV footage from three different bars in the town centre clearly showed that each one of the men had been socialising in the town centre on the nights of their respective disappearances. In a plea for further information from the public, the Gardai collaborated with RTE and aired a Crime Line special. Recorded scenes from the final hours of each man’s life were shown. Viewing each segment of CCTV footage, none could fail to notice that each segment had one thing in common: the clips clearly showed that all three men were seen engaged in conversation with the very same man on the nights of their disappearances and subsequent murders. The man they were speaking with looked to be about 35-40 years old and was distinctive in appearance as he wore an eye patch. Having examined the unique set of circumstances involved in each victim’s respective disappearance and subsequent murder, it did not take a genius to determine that the man with the eye patch was the only common factor in all these cases. Concerned members of the public telephoned Crime Line to ask if the Gardai were investigating the man with the eye patch as a suspect and if they had brought him in for questioning.
The Garda Commissioner replied to caller queries on Crime Line to say that: “Garda policy is to rule out all other possibilities before bringing the man with the eye patch, who happens to be a medical doctor, into Kilkenny Garda station for questioning: there is no certain connection between the deaths of the three victims and the man with the eye patch, it may be a coincidence that he happened to be conversing with each victim on the night of his death, but we aren’t sure. As things stand, the official position is that the Gardai are scratching their heads looking for leads in this very complex case”.
The commissioner further added that “all of the victims were elderly with underlying health conditions and were in all likelihood near the end of the natural lifespans anyway and that the Gardai were not alarmed by their deaths”.
Consider this: if the above fictitious scenario had happened then:
Nothing Crazy so far right? Now contrast the above fictional narrative with the following factual events that involve ten times the number of deaths:
FACT: Steiner Madsen had the temerity to state that ‘Clearly Covid is far more dangerous to most patients than vaccination. We are not alarmed.’
The above scenario is a matter of historical record: it has happened and
While the general public queued up for Covid-19 vaccinations in year 2020 in the hope of having their former freedoms restored they did not consider that should they themselves suffer a vaccine injury, the official position taken by Government will be adversarial and (i.e. just as it says in the Daily Mail Article) “determining whether or not the vaccine caused deaths can be very challenging and requires that all other potential causes be ruled out first”. The care home deaths happened quickly but a phenomenon known as antibody dependent enhance (aka pathogenic priming) will kill many of the vaccinated: In May 2020 Professor Dolores Cahill’s May-2020 warned of death following receipt covid mRNA vaccines that would likely occur 6-12 months after the vaccine.
Check this out for yourself: Delores Cahill explains 31 mins in:
and you can read the supporting medical journal articles referenced by Delores Cahill here:
In general the Irish public it would seem don’t do much critical thinking so in the interests of saving them from Government tyranny, Truth-Watch. Today was set up to convey the facts surrounding Covid-19 that the mainstream media won’t touch. The eight takeaway points from this story that the Irish Citizenry needs to take on board are:
Questions for the reader:
Some necessary background perspective:
To understand how to permanently stop the Covid-19 vaccine rollout, we must first consider some realities pertaining to the knowledge of Irish medical professionals and the conditions of their employment. Once we understand these, the plan to tackle the problem becomes obvious. We begin by presenting these insights:
A UK example: Beginning from 1min and 4 seconds into this clip we hear an NHS vaccine specialist speak out about the wholesale lack of knowledge among colleague doctors, nurses and even medical specialists surrounding the dangers of Covid-19 vaccines, vaccine ingredients and the scale of adverse reactions.
An Irish Example: A recent Facebook post told the story of how an Irish person attended a local GP’s practice to request a medical exemption from requiring a covid-19 vaccination citing justification for the exemption upon the following bases:
Justification #1: All covid-19 vaccines have been given emergency use approval only: None had completed clinical trials and, even when their respective ongoing clinical trials have been completed (somewhere between 2022 to 2024 depending on the vaccine), all of these trials will have skipped the usual animal trials. This made the patient nervous. The patient did not want to be coerced into injecting an untested vaccine into her blood stream to enable her to keep her job.
Justification #2: The patient was already taking medication for a serious a pre-existing condition and pointed out that clinical studies had not been carried out to determine the safety of covid ‘vaccine’ when taken in combination with the medication that the patient was already taking.
Justification #3: The patient present hardcopy printouts to her GP showing the overwhelming evidence of vaccine injury that the media will not publish, these printouts included:
At the time of her GP visit, this data clearly showed 167,000 in the EU alone experiencing serious adverse reactions. She pointed out that tens of thousands in the EU experienced serious adverse reactions in a manner that exactly mirrored her pre-existing medical condition. She asked her GP if she agreed that these adverse events were of concern since her health had already been significantly compromised by a similar pre-existing condition that has had her hospitalized in the past. Moreover, there had been circa 3150 EU deaths of vaccine recipients soon after having vaccine. The GP was incredulous i.e., the GP doubted that what she was being told was even true: i.e., she had only heard of the 78 blood clot deaths widely reported on the MSM and was astounded to hear that 3150 deaths and 167,000 adverse events had been reported in the EU.
Thereafter the encounter with the GP becomes like something out of a Franz Kafka novel: Despite the evidence presented, the GP still claimed that the vaccines were “safe”. The patient asked her if she would be happy to tell the relatives of the thousands of vaccine dead and vaccine maimed that these vaccines were safe? The GP said that the “benefits outweighed the risks” and again she was asked if she would be happy to say that to the relatives of the thousands of vaccine dead and vaccine maimed? The GP then told the patient that she would “never find an Irish Doctor that would write a letter of exemption because all Irish doctors are in one way or another on the payroll of the HSE and the HSE recommended the vaccines, and no doctor would go against the HSE”.
The nub of the problem:
Truth-Watch.Today’s Medical Entrapment Plan:
We need truthers in every town in Ireland to
The intent is that any medical professional engaged in administering these shots need only read the headlines of each article to get the general idea that these vaccines are indeed causing harm. Once you have served them with the evidence, they can no longer deny in a court of law that they were ignorant of the harm caused by these vaccines – the legal liability trap has now been sprung. Any vaccines administered following receipt of these documents is a vaccine administered despite clear knowledge of harm to patients. A conviction on these grounds is enough to get them struck off the medical register and to have their licenses to practice revoked.
The very first thing the doctor or nurse should see as they open your registered envelope is the notice of liability letter and underneath this letter should be all of the documents you have printed out as per (1) above.
Once GPs have been made aware of the scale of the vaccine injuries and begin receiving notices of liability,
they will start to get nervous and should any reader of TWT know of anyone that does die following their shot that reader should contact the family and inform them of why they can and should take a legal case against the doctor or nurse. Once these cases start in earnest doctors won’t want to administer the jabs. They will not be able to deny knowledge of vaccine injury in court if you and other truthers can testify that you sent them the data. Then they will be guilty of premeditated malpractice and struck off the medical register.
The letter that should accompany of the evidence of vaccine injury and death is as follows:
Dear [enter the GPs name here],
FYI: Covid-19 mRNA vaccines do not meet the medical definition of a vaccine; they are gene untested therapy
The intent of this communication is:
In light of the above you should consider this communication a notice of liability should you decide to engage in the administration of these treatments on gullible and unwitting patients. Should any of your patients die following these vaccines the families of the bereaved will be contacted and advised that they can and should (in the name of safe guarding others) prosecute you personally in a court of law on a charge of contributary manslaughter or other charge relating to bodily harm and medical malfeasance.
Please respond to this correspondence to confirm whether it is your intent to administer any of the so-called mRNA covid-19 ‘vaccines’ despite the attached clear evidence of harm caused to patients by these treatments.
Please also confirm if you plan to prescribe hydroxychloroquine, the safest medicine with the most proven track record to any patients presenting with respiratory illness to any patient presenting with respiratory illness that you suspect may be SARS-COV2?
– sign off the letter as “concerned citizen” if you want to remain anonymous for now – but if and when the court case comes you must be willing to take the stand and testify that you sent the evidence of vaccine harm to the doctor or nurse. Get a friend to film you putting the data in the envelopes and then have some more footage taken of you posting them off at the post office and getting the registered post receipts and filming the tracking numbers.. You need to be able to prove that the evidence was presented to the doctor to prove they they engaged in premeditated harm.